This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey
Bruce Willis was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Although health status obviously affects the career of a public person, and Bruce Willis' health decline became known via trouble in his work life, it's a mistake for it to appear only under the "2020s: Critical decline, health problems and retirement" section, but be absent from the Personal Life section. It could easily be re-worked to balance both sections, and would strengthen the article. I came to Wikipedia today to check on his health status, and was surprised to not find it in his Personal Life section, which is the logical place to put it. Do the usual editors of the article approve? Denstat (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Atomic Scorch@Denstat I agree it is a problem and that nothing has been done about it for a long time now.
Unfortunately the health status is intrinsically linked to his career, while also a personsal matter. I haven't seen a "for more deacription, see the career section" type link in an article before. It is not efficient to repeat all health details in both the career and personsal life sections. It is misleading to have a brief mention of the health status in the personal life section as readers won't know it is covered in career. I don't know how to proceed, but at least it is mentioned in the lead. Commander Keane (talk) 00:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Done, thanks for the tip.--Commander Keane (talk) 23:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)